Staying the Course: Rothschild’s Investment Methodology

Pacific Funds portfolio managers discuss how they were able to “stay the course” during the market volatility in early 2018.


Informational commentary from Rothschild & Co Asset Management US Inc., the subadvisor to Pacific Funds U.S. Equity Funds.

To better understand the investment process at Rothschild & Co Asset Management US Inc. (Rothschild), we sat down with Tina Jones and Doug Levine, both managing directors and portfolio managers for the Pacific Funds U.S. Equity Funds. Despite a recent uptick in market volatility, it remains business as usual for the investment approach for these funds.

Volatility has spiked in recent months; what’s driving this?

Levine: The initial trigger may have been a January 2018 report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics showing that average hourly earnings increased by 2.9%. While the magnitude wasn’t huge, it was unexpected and broke a long string of results indicating that wage inflation remained firmly in check.

Not long after, the Trump administration announced plans for tariffs targeting $50–$60 billion of Chinese imports. The Information Technology sector, once the darling of the stock market, also came under fire as investors took profits in semiconductor stocks given valuations and concerns over potential double-bookings of customer receipts. Social-media stocks also declined following privacy concerns related to data collection on Facebook. More broadly, the market sold off on higher interest rates and weather-related concerns over rising input costs that could not be passed on to consumers.

As influential as these developments were in driving volatility higher, some of the spike may have been psychological; after a particularly strong run following the 2016 U.S. presidential election, a feeling of complacency may have given way to anxiety. The unwinding of leveraged trades that had assumed continued calm and repositioning of risk-parity trades (for example, rebalancing away from equities as the asset class became more volatile) also added fuel to the fire.

Amid the current market volatility, have you repositioned your portfolios?

Jones: When confronted with increased volatility, any review of our portfolios is done on a bottom-up basis. Rather than asking ourselves, “What’s the outlook for the market?,” we instead focus on individual stocks and whether or not the fundamentals have changed. Given the absence of a change in the fundamentals of our process as markets fluctuate, our approach is to “stay the course,” and that was largely the case during the first quarter, as we did not significantly increase our turnover.

In general, is it fair to say that you ignore broad-based market trends?

Levine: “Ignore” would be too strong; we certainly stay aware of market trends, such as the direction of interest rates, government policy, and so on. In individual industries, we try to remain cognizant of secular trends, such as the threat of online retailing versus a bricks-and-mortar approach. But macro-level trends can revert, and government policy can be notoriously difficult to predict. So, while we remain aware of market trends, we are first and foremost stock pickers.

"While we remain aware of market trends, we are first and foremost stock pickers" - Doug Levine

So how do you go about stock selection?

Jones: Our investment philosophy is to look for discounted relative valuation with what we call “expectational upside.”

With discounted relative valuation, we want to understand why a stock is less expensive relative to its peers. We ask, “Is there a good reason why it’s inexpensive now and will it continue to be in the future? Or is there something misunderstood or underappreciated in the market?” Then, we look to determine the potential for the discount to narrow and the potential drivers of multiple expansion.

When looking at expectational upside, we’re trying to understand the things that market participants are focused on to identify a consensus view. Once understood, we can determine if there is upside potential. For example, if a company is launching a new product or service, is this reflected in market expectations for the stock? We look to determine where the upside could come from and quantify the magnitude and likelihood of it so we can properly analyze the stock’s risk/return profile.

Will you walk us through a recent trade using this process?

Levine: An example of our process in action was our addition of the Grubhub stock, which is up over 47% (as of March 31, 2018) according to Bloomberg. Grubhub is an online food delivery service. Currently, there is only an estimated 5% market penetration in the food-delivery-service business, as most people still call restaurants direct, leaving huge room for growth. The industry’s potential sales estimates are between $75 and $200 billion.(1) In February 2018, they announced a growth partnership with Yum! Brands (which owns Kentucky Fried Chicken and Taco Bell). The stock market reacted positively to this agreement due to the business it will funnel into Grubhub.

What sets your investment process apart from its peers? And how has this served investors?

Jones: We believe our approach combines objectivity with sound judgement. We use a ranking tool to identify stocks with promising characteristics that can be objectively quantified, such as attractive relative valuations and expectational upside. While this step narrows the investment universe, it is just a starting point. We then perform fundamental analysis on these stocks to judge the potential catalysts for outperformance.

Finally, we attempt to build sound portfolios through stringent risk controls. We don’t want to have a situation where we get the story right with most of our stocks, only to have that nullified by some other factor or sector exposure. So, we limit position sizes and sector weights, and minimize the influence of factor-based risks. For example, if we are struggling to find stocks that meet our investment criteria in the Energy sector, we may look for ways to reduce that underweight. Over the long term, our belief is that these controls will not only control risk, but also ensure that we drive results through stock selection.

(1) Source: Rothschild analysis, May 2018.

Download PDF


All investing involves risk, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. Equity securities tend to go up or down in value, sometimes rapidly and unpredictably in response to many factors, including a company’s historical and prospective earnings, the value of its assets, general economic conditions, interest rates, investor perceptions and market liquidity.

Rothschild & Co Asset Management US Inc. is unaffiliated with Pacific Life Insurance Company.

Pacific Life Insurance Company is the administrator for Pacific Funds. It is not a fiduciary and therefore does not give advice or make recommendations regarding insurance or investment products.

You should consider a fund's investment goal, risks, charges, and expenses carefully before investing. The prospectus and/or the applicable summary prospectus contain this and other information about the fund and are available from your financial advisor. The prospectus and/or summary prospectus should be read carefully before investing.

Pacific Funds are distributed by Pacific Select Distributors, LLC (member FINRA & SIPC), a subsidiary of Pacific Life Insurance Company (Newport Beach, CA), and are available through licensed third parties. Pacific Funds refers to Pacific Funds Series Trust.

Continue Reading

Subscribe to receive industry news and insights


Please choose your role
Copyright 2020 © Pacific Life Insurance Company
Please Upgrade Your Browser.

Unfortunately, Internet Explorer is an outdated browser and we do not support it. To have the best browsing experience, please upgrade to Google Chrome, Firefox or Safari.